Hamilton Navy Reuse Property - Questions & Answers

Novato is pleased to present the Questions and Answers regarding the Hamilton Property.

Bidders Conference

RFP Questions and Answers March 23, 1999

Hamilton Officer’s Club

The following were questions submitted which were not answered at the meeting:

Q: How many copies of the business offer should be submitted?

A: One copy

Q: If the Capehart/Hillside units were torn down and replaced with new units (should a responding developer make such a proposal), would this cause a problem with the environmental analysis currently being conducted?

A: The EIS prepared for the Disposal and Reuse of Hamilton Field assumed that Capehart/Hillside units would be renovated, rather than demolished. In response to public comment received during the scoping process, the Hamilton Field Redevelopment EIR, (available for public review in mid May, 1999), will programatically evaluate the impacts of Capehart/Hillside demolition in the alternatives section. Detailed construction level impacts may need to be evaluated on a site-specific basis once a development proposal (i.e. Precise Development Plan/Tentative Map) is submitted to the City for review during the entitlement process.

Q: How much was the Navy paying for fire protection prior to the current legal controversy between NFPD and the federal government?

A: $27,500 per month

Q: Which water district will the Master Developer be required to deal with?

A: This is currently being negotiated.

All facts and opinions stated herein and in all supporting documents and data, including but not limited to statistical and economic data and projections, are based on available information from a variety of sources. No representation or warranty is made with respect thereto. The Master Developer will be responsible for conducting all feasibility analyses required to undertake the development.

--- End of Questions and Answers ---